And the Hypocrisy continues

Sometimes you just have to laugh at the ACLU. They now find themselves in the unfortunate but very laughable position of fighting both sides of the same battle. According to a recent report in USA Today , the ACLU is arguing in New Jersey that a child can sing the song Awesome God in the schools talent show, while in Nevada they are arguing that the school valedictorian had no right to make reference to "the Lord" in her speech.

Huh?

How could 1 organization (who is partially funded by taxpayer dollars by the way) possibly be going to court representing opposite sides of a similar issue? Are we now to believe that the interpretation of the constitution varies from state to state, and what is free speech in New Jersey is not in Nevada?

Or maybe... just maybe, what the ACLU is trying to do, and have been trying to do ever since they were found in 1920 (by a know communist), is to distort our view of the constitution so much that it is deemed irrelevant. Why else would they constantly be in a court room trying to re-interpret the constitution to fit their needs, even if their needs change from day to day.